2.
I notice that Your Lordship disapproves of Section 15 of that Ordinance on the ground that branding can be justified only in rare cases, where it may be of vital importance to be able to identify a Criminal, but Her Majesty's Government cannot sanction it as a punishment.
3. I am very anxious that before Your Lordship arrives at a final decision in a matter of such extreme importance, you should have before you my despatch No. 160 of the 23rd last November, announcing the state of the Gaol at Stone Cutters' Island, and entering very fully into the whole subject of the position of this colony unavoidably brought, as it is, face to face with such a moving mass of Crime and vagabondage, caused by its immediate proximity to millions of the worst population of the Chinese Empire.
I apprehend that no description can more fully point out the necessity for adopting means of identifying Offenders than Your Lordship's definition that they should only be employed where it may be of vital importance to be able to identify a "Criminal". And that it should "not be sanctioned as a punishment."
5. I would respectfully suggest that Paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11, together with...
2.
ல்
2.
I notice that Your Sordship
branding & blogging
منتقد
&
>
it as
H.
I
#
#
dis approves of Section 15 of that
Ordinance on
branding
very
the
ground
that
can be justified only" in
where it may
rare cases, where it
be of
vital importance to be able to identify
a Criminal, but Her Majestip's
ment cannot sanction
Government co
a
3.
punishment.
I am very anxious that before Your Lordship arrives at
a
final
decision in a matter of such extreme
importance, you should have before you
my despatch No 16o of the 23rd last
November,
announcing
the
the present of the Gaol at Stone
butter's Island, and entering very
3
122
fully into the whole subject of the position of this bolony unavoidably brought, as it is, face to face with such
a
moving mass of Crime and
vagabondage, caused by its immediate proximity to
millions of the worst population of the Chinese Compire.
apprehend that no
can more
description
fully point out the necefaity
for adopting
means
of identifying Offenders
than Your Lorship's definition that
they should only be employed where
N
it
i
may
be of vital importance to be able
to identify
Criminal". And that it
should "not be sanctioned as a
180 6051
closing for am 28.4
punishment."
5.
I would respectfully suggest
that
Paragraphs 8, 9, 10, +11
together with
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.